[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Moving ahead

To: "'Sheppard,Martin L.'" <sheppard@mitre.org>
Subject: RE: Moving ahead
From: Craig Ozancin <cozancin@axent.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 12:05:35 -0400
Cc: cve-review@linus.mitre.org

> I believe that the comment Adam makes regarding CAN-1999-0014 should
> mean that the description should be modified, not that the candidate
> should be rejected.  Rejected, in my mind, means that there is no
> vulnerability or that another CVE entry covers the vulnerability under
> consideration.   Do I understand the meaning of Rejected and Modify
> correctly?
> 

I agree with this definition. I believe that the definition needs
clarification. The vulnerability I believe is valid.

Craig

Prev by Date: Re: Moving ahead
Next by Date: Andre Frech's comments on CVE CERT candidate cluster
Prev by thread: test - please respond
Next by thread: Andre Frech's comments on CVE CERT candidate cluster
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Page Last Updated or Reviewed: May 22, 2007

Use of the CVE® List and the associated references from this website are subject to the terms of use. CVE is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Copyright © 1999–2024, The MITRE Corporation. CVE and the CVE logo are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation.