|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: INTERIM DECISION: ACCEPT 5 SA category candidates (Final 9/28)
- To: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@linus.mitre.org>
- Subject: Re: INTERIM DECISION: ACCEPT 5 SA category candidates (Final 9/28)
- From: Gene Spafford <spaf@cs.purdue.edu>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 16:15:12 -0500
- Cc: cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
- Delivery-Date: Sun Sep 26 17:16:02 1999
- In-Reply-To: <199909251805.OAA14228@basie.mitre.org>
- References: <199909251805.OAA14228@basie.mitre.org>
- Reply-To: spaf@cs.purdue.edu
If I am running a modified version of "finger", is that an exposure? I could have a modified version that returns false information, or a canned message about who to contact for info. I would argue that simply have a running server for finger, or rwho, or any of the other things is not the exposure. --spaf
- References:
- Re: INTERIM DECISION: ACCEPT 5 SA category candidates (Final 9/28)
- From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@linus.mitre.org>
- Re: INTERIM DECISION: ACCEPT 5 SA category candidates (Final 9/28)
- Prev by Date: Changes to the CVE version number scheme
- Next by Date: Re: INTERIM DECISION: ACCEPT 5 SA category candidates (Final 9/28)
- Prev by thread: Re: INTERIM DECISION: ACCEPT 5 SA category candidates (Final 9/28)
- Next by thread: Re: INTERIM DECISION: ACCEPT 5 SA category candidates (Final 9/28)
- Index(es):