|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
- To: cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
- Subject: Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
- From: Pascal Meunier <pmeunier@purdue.edu>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:09:42 -0500
- Delivery-Date: Tue Mar 14 09:10:45 2000
- In-Reply-To: <200003140208.VAA25060@basie.mitre.org>
- References: <200003140208.VAA25060@basie.mitre.org>
- Sender: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
>The Board also reviewed CD:EX-BETA. Attendees agreed that CVE should >include problems in beta software, provided that the beta code was >intended for public dissemination. I missed that part. I would like to know why people think that bugs in admittedly buggy, pre-release, short-lived software run by a few people (on hopefully sandboxed or somehow protected or unimportant systems) should be of concern to the CVE. By the time we finish voting on it, the beta testing will likely be finished... Besides, we're already submerged by candidates. I think we should concentrate on the important ones. Pascal
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
- From: Gene Spafford <spaf@cerias.purdue.edu>
- Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
- References:
- [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
- From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@linus.mitre.org>
- [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
- Prev by Date: [TECH] Candidates with enough votes - but no vendor confirmation!
- Next by Date: Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
- Prev by thread: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
- Next by thread: Re: [CVEPRI] March 9-10 Editorial Board Meeting Summary
- Index(es):