RE: FINAL version of CyberCrime Treaty statement - ready for sign atures

["Prosser, Mike" <mprosser@symantec.com>]

I think we all understand your and Andy's predicament Kevin.  I, and
probably others, needed at least a basic approval to use my position in
signing this even with the disclaimer that I was not representing my company
in doing so.

-mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin J. Ziese [mailto:ziese@CISCO.COM]
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 1:00 PM
To: cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
Subject: RE: FINAL version of CyberCrime Treaty statement - ready for
signatures


Everyone,

All the recent signings have really highlighted just how important our
affiliations are to our letter.  Signing the letter without our affiliations
wouldn't strengthen the letter; in fact we think it would detract from it.
We're in something of a Catch-22 because we can't sign the letter with our
positions and/or affiliations without a priori coporate OK.  We remain in
complete and total agreement with the thoughts and views expressed in the
Treaty Condemnation Letter, we just can't sign it.


Kevin J. Ziese, Computer Scientist			Andy Balinsky,
Network Security
Engineer
Critical Infrastructures Assurance Group        Security Technologies
Assessment Team
Cisco Systems, Inc.				      Cisco Systems, Inc.