|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
- To: David LeBlanc <dleblanc@microsoft.com>, "'Scott Blake'" <blake@BOS.BINDVIEW.COM>, cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
- Subject: RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
- From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr@nfr.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:51:02 -0400
- Delivery-Date: Tue Jun 27 09:55:32 2000
- In-Reply-To: <C183CC073051D31184DA0008C707BBF00CE1B3D2@RED-MSG-41>
- Sender: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
>The treaty needs to EXPLICITLY allow for white hat activities and research. That's also impossible to define such as not to allow loopholes. mjr. ----- Marcus J. Ranum Chief Technology Officer, Network Flight Recorder, Inc. Work: http://www.nfr.net Personal: http://pubweb.nfr.net/~mjr
- References:
- RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
- From: David LeBlanc <dleblanc@microsoft.com>
- RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
- Prev by Date: RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
- Next by Date: Re: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
- Prev by thread: RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
- Next by thread: RE: [BOARD] Status of CyberCrime treaty statement
- Index(es):