[
Date Prev][Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: [CVEPRI] Progress report on timeliness of CVE
That's an impressive, incredible performance (300 candidates/month,
wow!). The news about candidate reservations make me particularly
happy given the attitudes expressed at FIRST. This was mirrored by
new candidates being detected more often than ever by the CVE Change
Log mechanism (9 times in August vs 5 in June,
https://cassandra.cerias.purdue.edu/CVE_changes/).
Glorious.
Pascal
At 11:45 PM -0400 8/29/02, Steven M. Christey wrote:
>All,
>
>Following is a brief progress report on what we are doing with respect
>to making CVE more timely.
>
>1) I am beginning to perform more "out-of-band" candidate reservation
> for the most serious vulnerabilities, monitoring basic information
> sources on a near-daily basis. Typically, this means that they
> will show up on the CVE server within a few days of announcement.
>
>2) Candidates are being reserved by more parties. Most notably, Linux
> vendors are starting to become more involved (thanks in large part
> to Mark Cox' efforts.)
>
>3) I'm more heavily involved in the refinement phase, and I focus on
> more recent issues. Other content team members continue refinement
> on older issues, plus those that "slip through the cracks" from my
> own refinements. It will take a few months to really understand
> how effective this new approach is going to be.
>
>4) I have begun to conduct a closer "process review" with those team
> members who do refinement, by consulting with the team member while
> refinement is happening, in addition to the "editor feedback" that
> I've mentioned previously. Initial results suggest that this will
> help team members to generate content more quickly. Side-by-side
> consultation has been difficult due to the geographical dispersion
> of team members, who may adopt certain practices that are not as
> efficient as the ones I've developed (and vice versa :-)
>
>5) Candidates are being proposed more often. Currently, the rate is
> once a month, which is faster than the every-6-weeks average of the
> previous year or so. I will see if we can improve the frequency
> even more.
>
>The result is that I am about to propose another 300+ candidates, only
>a month after the last proposal. At this stage, we have generated
>more candidates than we did in all of 2001. And the recent timeliness
>figures speak for themselves (see below).
>
>- Steve
>
>
>
>PROPOSED #cans 0-30d 31-60d 61-90d 90+
>-------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
>20020830 334 98 97 60 79
>20020726 147 66 9 51 21
>20020611 285 43 58 92 92
>20020502 331 49 2 127 153
>20020315 237 40 22 62 113
>20020131 234 40 13 48 133
>20011122 71 46 4 2 19
>20011012 84 22 1 0 61
>20010912 583 0 1 0 582
>20010829 60 14 2 20 24
>20010727 127 32 11 31 53
>20010524 167 50 70 43 4
>20010404 79 9 45 23 2
>20010309 83 27 52 4 0
>20010214 56 12 29 0 15
>20010202 106 21 79 6 0
>20001219 111 60 50 1 0
>20001129 190 29 113 45 3
>20001018 68 3 54 10 1
>20000921 127 32 91 4 0
>20000803 55 55 0 0 0
>20000719 53 53 0 0 0
>20000712 98 36 62 0 0
>20000615 92 47 45 0 0
>20000524 22 0 0 0 22
>20000518 37 28 2 0 7
>20000426 54 53 1 0 0
>20000412 22 21 1 0 0
>20000322 58 54 4 0 0
>20000223 15 15 0 0 0
>20000216 14 14 0 0 0
>20000215 1 0 0 1 0
>20000208 50 50 0 0 0
>20000125 43 43 0 0 0
>20000111 43 41 0 1 1
>19991222 48 19 6 4 19
>19991214 38 20 10 1 7
>19991208 50 43 0 0 7
--
Pascal Meunier, Ph.D., M.Sc.
Assistant Research Scientist,
CERIAS
Purdue University