|
|
On 03/07/2016 08:53 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
"The vendor declined to fix the vulnerability".
That one is jaw-dropping. By implication, if I refuse to fix it, you can't mention it, discuss it, or issue an advisory about it? That's obstructing vulnerability disclosure, and a way to stimulate full disclosure by default for future issues.
Can MITRE please report how many times this reason is used?
Pascal