RE: Redux: Scheduling a Board Discussion Telecon

["Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>]

I appreciate the 13 responses to the Doodle poll. Due to the CVE 
meeting scheduled this Wednesday, I am not going to schedule another 
meeting this week. 

Thanks for responding.

Regards,
Dave

David Waltermire
Information Technology Laboratory | Computer Security Division
National Institute of Standards and Technology

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 10:40 AM
> To: 'cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org' <cve-editorial-board-
> list@lists.mitre.org>
> Subject: Redux: Scheduling a Board Discussion Telecon
> 
> Due to a change in Kurt's schedule, I'd like to propose new times for 
> the
> discussion. I'll cancel the original. My apologies for the 
> inconvenience.
> 
> The new Doodle poll is at:
> 
> http://doodle.com/poll/8n2fn78d2s743m32
> 
> Please respond to this poll by CoB 3/24. I'll send out call details 
> once we have
> a date/time selected.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dave
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 5:40 PM
> > To: cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org
> > Subject: Scheduling a Board Discussion Telecon
> >
> > We have been talking about having a discussion on the path forward
> > around CVE for a while, but we haven't been able to get something
> > scheduled. To get this conversation started, I would like to 
> > schedule
> > an initial hour call. We would like to get as much board 
> > participation
> > as possible. Please respond to the following Doodle poll to indicate
> > your availability for next week and 4/4. It would be ideal to talk 
> > on 3/28 if
> you are available.
> >
> > http://doodle.com/poll/86qgs3efa3aswbqk
> >
> > Please respond to this poll by CoB 3/24. I'll send out call details
> > once we have a date/time selected.
> >
> > As an initial agenda topic, I'd like to suggest that we give some 
> > time
> > for Kurt Seifried to discuss his ideas around the Distributed 
> > Weakness
> > Filing (DWF) System. I believe he has a number of good ideas that we
> > may want to adopt for CVE. It would be good to discuss them as a 
> > group.
> >
> > If you have other suggestions for the agenda, please respond with 
> > your
> > ideas.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > David Waltermire
> > Information Technology Laboratory | Computer Security Division
> > National Institute of Standards and Technology
> >