RE: Regarding USCYBERCOM

["Millar, Thomas" <Thomas.Millar@hq.dhs.gov>]

I'm not anointing anyone, I'm just going to find out who to talk to, via our liaisons with them.

IME, If it's anything like every other vulnerability-related item with DoD, they will be super happy to let DHS continue as their trustee.



Tom Millar, US-CERT

Sent from +1-202-631-1915
https://www.us-cert.gov

 

---

From: Landfield, Kent B
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 7:26:06 PM
To: Millar, Thomas
Cc: Kurt Seifried; cve-editorial-board-list
Subject: Re: Regarding USCYBERCOM

Can we talk about this before we anoint someone?

Personally I do not believe we should be adding board members based on news articles. Let's see how it goes first and then if it makes sense, do it. 

What would be the international repercussions by doing this? We want CVE as a global vulnerability identification means, not just a US one. 

At this point we have not had the preliminary discussions to tie ourselves to aa org such as this. Let's have those first...

Kent Landfield

Intel Corporation 

Kent.B.Landfield@intel.com

+1.817.637.8026 

On Aug 10, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Millar, Thomas <Thomas.Millar@hq.dhs.gov> wrote:

I can reach out



Tom Millar, US-CERT

Sent from +1-202-631-1915
https://www.us-cert.gov

 

---

From: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org on behalf of Kurt Seifried
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 6:39:15 PM
To: cve-editorial-board-list
Subject: Regarding USCYBERCOM

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-idUSKCN10G254

I'm guessing we want to have them on the board, do we have anyone there we can reach out to? 

--
Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud
PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
Red Hat Product Security contact: secalert@redhat.com