|
|
All,Microsoft has assigned a single CVE to cover "all April Adobe Flash updates" apparently:
https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-us/security-guidance/acknowledgments April Flash Security Update 2017-3447Which links to https://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2017-3447.
Further, there is a single ID to cover "defense-in-depth" updates for a product:
Defense-in-Depth Update for Microsoft Office 2017-2605 Which links to https://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2017-2605I am fairly confident that 2017-3447 is not a proper assignment and does not follow the CNA guidelines, about assigning IDs to another vendor's products (and that vendor happens to be a CNA themselves). We've seen this done in the past with Oracle as well.
I'd also be surprised if a single ID assignment for multiple defense-in-depth enhancements meets the criteria of a CVE ID, since DiD enhancements generally do not mean there is a crossing of privilege boundaries, and therefore not vulnerabilities.
Could Microsoft and MITRE chime in on these please? Brian