Re: Current standards/criteria for 'Undefined Behavior'

["Landfield, Kent" <Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com>]

Can you let us know why you don’t participate in the calls? Is it a 
time issue? If so we can work to try to find a better time that 
accommodates more Board members.  I agree and have stated in the past 
that real decisions need to be made on the Board list(s).  The Board 
calls however, do give us a higher bandwidth opportunity to go more 
in-depth on specific issues.  We need all to be there if possible and 
have had reasonable attendance lately.  

Can you enlighten us as to why you do not attend?

--
Kent Landfield
817-637-8026
kent_landfield@mcafee.com

On 5/11/17, 11:52 PM, "owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org 
on behalf of jericho" <owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org 
on behalf of jericho@attrition.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 11 May 2017, Coffin, Chris wrote:
    
    : Sorry? I don?t think we were aware of the conflict. My thinking 
is that 
    : we push to the following Wednesday as I would imagine that this 
already 
    : fits most folks schedules. Unless there are any objections, we?ll 
move 
    : the meeting early next week.
    
    I'd also like to remind MITRE that the calls do not include all of 
the 
    board for a variety of reasons. I haven't looked at the notes 
lately to 
    see if there is even a majority.
    
    But two of the people who brought this up / showed concern and gave 
reason 
    for MITRE to reconsider, are typically not on those calls.
    
    As such, I think this is a great time to have a discussion on the 
list 
    where we can all participate and have it documented fully.
    
    Brian