|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Closing the CVE gap: Is MITRE up to it?
- To: "cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org" <cve-editorial-board-list@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- Subject: Closing the CVE gap: Is MITRE up to it?
- From: Art Manion <amanion@cert.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:01:47 -0400
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 129.83.29.2) smtp.mailfrom=LISTS.MITRE.ORG; mitre.mail.onmicrosoft.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mitre.mail.onmicrosoft.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cert.org;
- Delivery-date: Mon Jul 10 15:56:23 2017
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu v6AI1qo6001298
- List-help: <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MITRE.ORG?body=INFO%20CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST>
- List-owner: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-subscribe-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- Sender: <owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: 5952c28dcc454f0789fb433d26f936ef
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:2
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
CVE story with some familiar names interviewed: http://www.csoonline.com/article/3204568/application-security/closing-the-cve-gap-is-mitre-up-to-it.html - Art
- Prev by Date: RE: Current standards/criteria for 'Undefined Behavior'
- Next by Date: RE: Document Review - CVE ID Request Guidelines
- Previous by thread: Re: An example of hardware/software vulns - GPUs
- Next by thread: Agenda for CVE Board Meeting July 12
- Index(es):