|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- To: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@redhat.com>
- Subject: Re: Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- From: jericho <jericho@attrition.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 13:16:16 -0500
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 129.83.29.2) smtp.mailfrom=LISTS.MITRE.ORG; mitre.mail.onmicrosoft.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mitre.mail.onmicrosoft.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=attrition.org;
- Cc: cve-editorial-board-list <cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org>
- Delivery-date: Mon Oct 23 15:49:25 2017
- Importance: high
- In-reply-to: <CANO=Ty0n3m2MRBj0LRQmfckizF_adJsRsdn7NfGUDON5Yab0_Q@mail.gmail.com>
- List-help: <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.MITRE.ORG?body=INFO%20CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST>
- List-owner: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-subscribe-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.MITRE.ORG>
- References: <CACph5NWoe1C7G0suzRH-Xc4HREUO+x4k88WNuuK1KZg1VRNwyg@mail.gmail.com> <3c7155a4-16b3-7ce7-1020-2686e3e81712@cert.org> <CANO=Ty0DiaGyP1LB4OgMLbys4dcC1w0ZCvNW5H6DL6PWnTBmWw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1710231230270.21035@forced.attrition.org> <CANO=Ty0n3m2MRBj0LRQmfckizF_adJsRsdn7NfGUDON5Yab0_Q@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: <owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: 5952c28dcc454f0789fb433d26f936ef
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:2
- User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Kurt Seifried wrote: : I would say simply: ban him until he shows improvement and sticks to it. : Why place a time limit on it? Either he starts making good requests, or : he doesn't. I did not suggest a time limit other than 'temporary', contingent upon the quality improving or at the very least, including PoCs. Brian : On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:32 AM, jericho <jericho@attrition.org> wrote: : : > To me, that meets the bar for a temporary ban until he better appreciates : > that his reports are lacking serious detail and contain numerous : > duplicates.
- References:
- Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- From: Carsten Eiram <che@riskbasedsecurity.com>
- Re: Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- From: Art Manion <amanion@cert.org>
- Re: Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@redhat.com>
- Re: Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- From: jericho <jericho@attrition.org>
- Re: Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@redhat.com>
- Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- Prev by Date: Re: Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- Next by Date: RE: Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- Previous by thread: Re: Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- Next by thread: RE: Problematic assignments for subpar reports via CVE request form
- Index(es):