Re: An interesting data point

[jericho <jericho@attrition.org>]

On Mon, 4 Dec 2017, Kurt Seifried wrote:

: So from the current crop of CVE requests the DWF got:
: 
:  7 BAD:DESCRIPTION
:    8 BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:DETAILS
:   23 BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:PRODUCT,BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:VERSION
:   19 BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:VERSION
:    1 BAD:MULTIPLE_ISSUES
:   11 BAD:REF_URL
:    1 
BAD:REF_URL,BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:VERSION,BAD:DESCRIPTION:MISSING:PRODUCT
:    2 BAD:VULN_TYPE
:    1 NEEDINFO
:  153 OK
: 
: The status codes are at 
: 
https://github.com/distributedweaknessfiling/DWF-Documentation/blob/master/DWF-STATUS-ERROR-CODES-for-CVE-requests.md
 
: but should be pretty self evident. The good news is that a lot of 
these 
: can be fixed without to much work, but I definitely need to figure 
out 
: how to help people make better requests/write the descriptions (or 
auto 
: generate them.. I think that's the way to go).

Out of curiosity, since the information above doesn't let me figure it 
out, what was the disposition code for CVE-2017-1000186? Curious if 
that 
was one of the non-OK entries.

Brian